Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), an English philosopher living through an era of profound political and social upheaval, is a foundational figure in modern political philosophy. His seminal work, Leviathan (1651), is not merely a historical document but a powerful and enduring treatise that continues to shape our understanding of government, human nature, and the delicate balance between freedom and security. Hobbes’s ideas were revolutionary for their time, challenging traditional notions of divine right and advocating for a radically new social order founded on reason and self-interest. His philosophy, born from the chaos of the English Civil War, offered a compelling and starkly realistic solution to the problem of political instability, a powerful, centralized sovereign authority.
Follow CPF WhatsApp Channel for Daily Exam Updates
Cssprepforum, led by Sir Syed Kazim Ali, supports 70,000+ monthly aspirants with premium CSS/PMS prep. Follow our WhatsApp Channel for daily CSS/PMS updates, solved past papers, expert articles, and free prep resources.
1. The Historical and Intellectual Roots of Hobbes's Thought
Hobbes’s life was inextricably linked to the political turmoil of 17th-century England. Born in the year of the Spanish Armada, he famously quipped that "fear and I were born twins together." This personal sense of insecurity was amplified by the national conflicts he witnessed, culminating in the English Civil War (1642-1651). This violent conflict between the monarchy and Parliament, fueled by religious tensions and a struggle for power, profoundly influenced his political philosophy. Hobbes saw firsthand how the absence of a strong, unified authority could lead to a societal breakdown, exposing the brutal realities of war and human conflict.
Moreover, educated at Oxford, Hobbes was a scholar of classical philosophy, mathematics, and scientific methods. He was deeply influenced by the scientific revolution of his time, seeking to apply a rational, almost mathematical, approach to the study of human society. His time as a tutor to the wealthy and politically connected Cavendish family provided him with an insider's view of the court and the political machinations of the era. This unique blend of academic rigor and direct political experience led him to develop a political theory grounded in a pessimistic, yet logical, view of human nature.
2. Famous Work of Thomas Hobbes
The State of Nature: A Life "Solitary, Poor, Nasty, Brutish, and Short"
To begin, the most influential work that gave fame to his political career was his vivid and unsettling depiction of the state of nature. According to this theory in this hypothetical pre-social condition, there is no government, no laws, and no overarching authority to enforce order. He rejected the more optimistic view that humans are naturally good or cooperative. Instead, he posited that individuals are fundamentally self-centered, driven by a relentless desire for power and self-preservation. Therefore, this psychological egoism means that every person is a potential threat to every other person.
In the state of nature, all individuals are roughly equal in their capacity to inflict harm. This equality, paradoxically, leads to constant competition and conflict over resources and prestige. Hobbes famously summarized life in this state as a "war of every man against every man," where there is no justice or injustice, only a continuous struggle for survival. Furthermore, he painted a grim picture of this existence, describing it as "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." The constant fear of a violent death, coupled with the lack of trust, makes cooperation impossible, stifling innovation, culture, and progress.
For Hobbes, the state of nature is an intolerable condition that rational individuals would naturally seek to escape. This fear and the desire for security are the driving forces behind the formation of society and government.
The Social Contract: A Covenant for Peace
Accordingly, to provide a logical solution to the chaos of the state of nature, he introduced the concept of social contract. Hobbes argued that to secure their safety and well-being, individuals would collectively agree to surrender their absolute freedom to a single sovereign authority. However, this is a covenant, or agreement, not between the people and the sovereign, but between the people themselves to create a sovereign.
The terms of the contract are non-negotiable, individuals give up their right to govern themselves and submit to the absolute power of the sovereign in exchange for protection. Then the sovereign, or Leviathan, possesses absolute authority to make and enforce laws, levy taxes, command the military, and settle all disputes. In this model, the sovereign is the ultimate arbiter of law and justice, and their primary function is to maintain peace and order. To conclude, Hobbes was somehow the inventor of this rationalist approach to political legitimacy. He argued that not by divine right, but by the consent of the governed, the sovereign’s power is justified. It is the governed who, out of a rational fear of death, choose security over absolute freedom.
The Doctrine of Absolute Sovereignty
Moreover, Hobbes’s another most controversial and enduring contribution is his doctrine of absolute sovereignty. He insisted that the sovereign's power must be unlimited and indivisible. Any attempt to challenge or divide this power, such as through a system of checks and balances, or by allowing for popular dissent, would inevitably lead back to the conflicts of the state of nature. The sovereign is not a party to the social contract; therefore, cannot be challenged or overthrown by the people. The people's only recourse against the sovereign's authority is in the extreme case where the sovereign fails to provide basic security, thereby breaking the only condition of the contract.
Moreover, Hobbes’s vision of the sovereign is fundamentally authoritarian. He rejected the concept of popular sovereignty, which would later be championed by thinkers like Locke and Rousseau. The sovereign's authority is final, extending to all political, social, and even religious matters to prevent the emergence of factions that could destabilize the state. According to Hobbes, the sovereign is not bound by the laws they create for their subjects, but is justified in their actions as long as they preserve the peace. This uncompromising vision of a unified, all-powerful state was his direct response to the civil war he had witnessed, where competing authorities had plunged the nation into chaos.
3. The Legacy and Relevance of Hobbes’s Ideas in Modern Political Thought
while conceived in the 17th century, Hobbes’s ideas remain profoundly relevant in contemporary political discourse. His work laid the groundwork for several key areas of political theory.
Hobbes and Authoritarianism
The Hobbesian argument for a strong central authority is a cornerstone of modern authoritarian political thought. Regimes in countries like China and Russia often justify the centralization of power. For instance, by controlling dissent and limiting individual freedoms to some extent as measures for national stability and security, these governments echo Hobbes’s core belief that without a powerful, unchallenged state, society would descend into chaos and disorder.
Sovereignty in Times of Crisis
Moreover, Hobbes's theory finds its most direct application in how modern states respond to crises. In the wake of events like the 9/11 attacks or the COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world invoked emergency powers, expanded surveillance, and implemented measures that restricted civil liberties. These actions are a practical application of Hobbes's principle, in a state of emergency, the sovereign must act decisively to protect the population, even if it means temporarily sacrificing certain freedoms. This tension between security and liberty is a central theme in modern democratic debate.
Liberal Democratic Thought as Counter to Hobbes’s Idea of Absolute Power
Nevertheless, Hobbes's ideas stand in stark opposition to the liberal democratic tradition. Thinkers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau built upon the social contract idea but reached very different conclusions. Locke argued for a limited government that protects natural rights to life, liberty, and property, while Rousseau championed popular sovereignty. Modern democracies, with their systems of checks and balances, separation of powers, and protections for individual rights, are a direct rejection of Hobbes's call for absolute sovereignty.
Undoubtedly, even in liberal democracies, the Hobbesian worldview persists. The rise of populist movements and leaders like Donald Trump or Jair Bolsonaro often sees a public appetite for strong, decisive leadership that is willing to bypass institutional checks and balances in the name of restoring order and national unity. This suggests that the Hobbesian fear of chaos and the desire for a powerful leader who can solve society's problems is still a potent force in politics.
Want to Prepare for CSS/PMS 2027 English Essay & Precis Papers?
Learn to write persuasive and argumentative essays and master precis writing with Sir Syed Kazim Ali to qualify for CSS and PMS exams with high scores. Limited seats available; join now to enhance your writing and secure your success.
Political Realism in International Relations
Hobbes's influence extends beyond domestic politics to the field of international relations. The realist school of thought, with its proponents like Hans Morgenthau and John Mearsheimer, directly draws from Hobbes’s depiction of the state of nature. Realists argue that the international system is anarchic, with no global sovereign to enforce laws. Therefore, States exist in a perpetual struggle for power and security, acting primarily out of self-interest. This view of international relations as a power struggle, rather than a cooperative enterprise, is a clear extension of Hobbes’s pessimistic view of human nature.
In conclusion, Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan is a timeless work of political philosophy because it addresses fundamental questions about human nature, power, and the purpose of government. His stark, realist perspective, that humanity's natural state is one of conflict and that only a powerful, centralized authority can secure peace, continues to provoke debate. While modern democratic systems have largely rejected his call for absolute sovereignty, his ideas remain crucial for understanding the tensions between individual freedom and state power, especially in times of crisis. The Hobbesian legacy is evident in debates over national security, the rise of authoritarianism, and the enduring relevance of political realism. Ultimately, Hobbes’s work serves as a powerful reminder of the fragility of social order and the profound human desire for stability in the face of chaos.
