18th Amendment: Evaluating Its Role in Addressing Centre-Province Grievances in Pakistan

1. Introduction

The relationship between the central government and its constituent provincial units is the bedrock of any federal system, defining its stability and efficacy. Pakistan, a diverse nation grappling with significant ethnic, linguistic, and cultural heterogeneity, has continuously navigated the complexities of federalism since its inception. This dynamic interplay between the Centre and provinces has profoundly shaped Pakistan's political landscape, economic trajectory, and quest for national cohesion. This comprehensive analysis delves into the intricate constitutional framework, historical evolution, persistent challenges, and transformative reforms, particularly the 18th Constitutional Amendment, that characterise centre-province relations in Pakistan. For students to analyse centre-province relations, a nuanced understanding of these dynamics is paramount, as they encapsulate the essence of Pakistan's governance challenges and its ongoing journey towards a more equitable and balanced federation. The inherent tension between the desire for a strong national government and the imperative of regional autonomy lies at the heart of Pakistan's federal conundrum, often leading to friction but also spurring constitutional evolution.

2. How the Constitutional Framework is Crafting Power Distribution

Pakistan's constitutional journey is a testament to the continuous struggle to define the distribution of powers within its federal structure. Each constitutional iteration and subsequent amendment has attempted to strike a balance, reflecting prevailing political exigencies and the demands for provincial rights.

2.1 Early Constitutional Developments (1947-1973)

The initial constitutional framework adopted by Pakistan was based on the Government of India Act, 1935, which, while federal in structure, maintained strong centralising tendencies. Pakistan’s first indigenous constitution, enacted in 1956, introduced a parliamentary federal system but was short-lived, as it was soon abrogated. This was followed by General Ayub Khan’s 1962 Constitution, which entrenched a presidential form of government and further centralised authority, significantly weakening provincial autonomy. Throughout these formative decades, the political architecture consistently favoured a dominant Centre, often rationalised as necessary for post-partition nation-building. However, this centralisation sowed enduring provincial resentment and alienation, ultimately contributing to the tragic disintegration of the country with the secession of East Pakistan in 1971.

• Post-1971: The Search for a New Federal Design

The early years of Pakistan's constitutional development were marked by institutional ambiguity, political instability, and tension between centralisation and provincial autonomy. Between 1947 and 1973, multiple constitutional experiments failed to establish a sustainable federal structure. These constitutions tended to reinforce a strong central authority at the expense of genuine provincial empowerment. The lack of consensus on federalism, coupled with the political marginalisation of smaller provinces and East Pakistan, sowed deep-rooted grievances that eventually culminated in the secession of East Pakistan in 1971. This historical trauma necessitated a rethinking of Pakistan’s federal design.

• The 1973 Constitution: A Landmark Consensus

Adopted in the wake of the 1971 crisis, the 1973 Constitution was a deliberate and landmark effort to establish a more authentic federal and parliamentary system in Pakistan. It attempted to reconcile past imbalances by granting constitutional recognition to provincial rights while still maintaining the unity of the state. The Constitution introduced several important institutions and mechanisms to manage Centre–province relations and address historic grievances.

• Legislative Jurisdiction: FLL and the CLL 

The Federal Legislative List (FLL), detailed in the Fourth Schedule of the Constitution, enumerated subjects exclusively within federal jurisdiction, including defence, foreign affairs, currency, and communications. This demarcation served to clarify the boundaries of federal authority. Alongside this, the Concurrent Legislative List (CLL) allowed both federal and provincial governments to legislate on certain shared subjects. However, in the case of conflict, federal law would prevail, making the CLL a recurring source of provincial discontent and a perceived mechanism for federal encroachment. The eventual abolition of the CLL through the 18th Amendment was a pivotal move toward enhancing provincial autonomy.

• Inter-Governmental Relations: Residuary Powers and the CCI

The Constitution also conferred residuary powers explicitly to the provinces under Article 144. While theoretically a strong safeguard for provincial autonomy, these powers were often undermined by the entrenched centralising tendencies within the political system. The Council of Common Interests (CCI), established under Article 153, was designed as a key institution to harmonise intergovernmental relations, particularly on matters involving multiple provinces, such as energy resources and infrastructure development. Despite its foundational importance, the CCI’s role was historically underutilised, often relegated to a ceremonial function until its strengthening under the 18th Amendment.

• Fiscal Federalism: The NFC and NEC

The National Finance Commission (NFC), mandated under Article 160, emerged as a vital mechanism for the financial integration of the federal system. It oversees both vertical resource distribution from the federal divisible pool to the provinces and horizontal distribution among the provinces themselves. The NFC Award remains central to ensuring the fiscal viability of provinces and promoting equitable development. Additionally, the National Economic Council (NEC), created under Article 156, plays an advisory role, assisting both federal and provincial governments in assessing economic conditions and formulating development strategies, though its recommendations are not binding.

• The Provincial Governor: A Tool of Federal Oversight

Another important constitutional office is that of the Provincial Governor, appointed by the President to act as the Centre’s representative in the province. Historically, Governors wielded substantial discretionary powers, including the authority to dissolve provincial assemblies, a function that was frequently perceived as a tool of federal dominance and interference. This power was eventually curtailed by the 18th Amendment, which aimed to reinforce provincial self-governance.

• Contemporary Challenges and Political Contradictions

Despite these structural provisions, the federal spirit of the 1973 Constitution has often been compromised. Periods of military rule, weak democratic transitions, and the centralising impulses of dominant political elites consistently subverted the Constitution’s commitment to provincial autonomy. As a result, Pakistan’s journey toward a truly balanced federal system has remained fraught with both structural challenges and political contradictions.

3. Historical Evolution from Centralisation to Decentralisation 

Pakistan’s federal history is a narrative of a powerful, often overbearing, Centre and provinces constantly striving for greater autonomy.

3.1 Historical Trajectory of Centralisation in Pakistan (1947–2008)

In the immediate post-independence years (1947–1958), Pakistan’s focus on nation-building and state consolidation naturally led to strong centralising tendencies. The administrative framework inherited from British colonial rule was inherently centralist, and early policies like the 'One Unit' scheme of 1955, which amalgamated all West Pakistani provinces into a single administrative unit, and contentious issues such as the Urdu versus Bengali language debate, served to further marginalise regional identities, particularly in East Pakistan. This trend of centralisation deepened under military regimes. General Ayub Khan’s rule (1958–1969) institutionalised presidential supremacy through the 1962 Constitution, sidelining provincial participation in governance. Although development occurred during this period, it was implemented through top-down approaches that alienated provincial stakeholders. General Zia-ul-Haq’s authoritarian regime (1977–1988) dissolved provincial assemblies and placed provinces under military governors, epitomising executive overreach. His 8th Amendment in 1985, especially Article 58(2)(b), granted the President sweeping powers to dismiss both national and provincial assemblies, further weakening provincial autonomy. The democratic interlude from 1988 to 1999 did little to change this dynamic. Centre–province friction persisted, particularly during periods of cohabitation when federal and provincial governments were controlled by rival political parties. The repeated invocation of Article 58(2)(b) to dissolve elected governments underscored the fragility of provincial autonomy, which remained constrained by fiscal dependence on federal transfers. Under General Pervez Musharraf (1999–2008), the introduction of the Local Government Ordinance in 2001 was a notable decentralisation initiative aimed at empowering district-level governance and bypassing provincial bureaucracies. However, while it devolved authority to the grassroots, it further weakened the role of provincial governments. The 17th Amendment (2003) under Musharraf also reinforced presidential powers, continuing the historical pattern of centralisation at the expense of a balanced federal structure.

3.2 The Dawn of Enhanced Provincial Autonomy Post-2008 and the 18th Amendment

The post-2008 period marked a transformative chapter in Pakistan’s federal evolution. Under the leadership of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), a broad-based coalition government achieved a rare and remarkable political consensus to introduce the landmark 18th Constitutional Amendment in 2010. This amendment represented the most significant legislative effort to date to recalibrate the balance of power between the Centre and the provinces. By transferring substantial legislative, administrative, and fiscal authority to provincial governments, it fundamentally reshaped Pakistan’s governance framework and underscored a renewed commitment to genuine federalism.

3.2.1 Key Institutions and Mechanisms for Inter-Governmental Relations

The functionality and resilience of Pakistan’s federal structure are largely dependent on a set of constitutional institutions specifically designed to manage and mediate centre–province relations. These bodies play a critical role in ensuring coordination, resolving disputes, and maintaining the cooperative spirit of federalism envisioned by the Constitution.

• Council of Common Interests (CCI)

The Council of Common Interests (CCI), established under Article 153 of the Constitution, serves as a pivotal forum for intergovernmental coordination and dispute resolution. Its membership includes the Prime Minister, all four Chief Ministers, and three federal ministers, thereby ensuring representation from both the federal and provincial tiers at the highest political level. The CCI is mandated to formulate and regulate policies on matters listed in Part II of the Federal Legislative List (FLL), including crucial areas such as railways, mineral oil, natural gas, and industrial development. It also supervises institutions operating across provincial boundaries and adjudicates inter-provincial disputes concerning water and other shared resources, in line with Articles 154, 161, and 157. The 18th Amendment significantly bolstered the CCI’s role by making its decisions binding on both the Centre and the provinces and requiring it to convene at least once every quarter. These changes transformed the CCI from a relatively dormant institution into a more effective mechanism for managing inter-provincial tensions and ensuring collaborative policy development on shared concerns.

• National Finance Commission (NFC) Award

Financial distribution lies at the heart of any federal system, and in Pakistan, the National Finance Commission (NFC), constituted under Article 160, is the key constitutional mechanism for allocating resources between the Centre and the provinces. The NFC determines both the vertical distribution of revenues from the federal divisible pool among the provinces and the horizontal distribution among the provinces themselves. Historically, NFC Awards were often delayed and marred by disagreements. However, the 7th NFC Award of 2010, finalised shortly before the 18th Amendment, marked a watershed moment. It increased the provincial share in the divisible pool from 47.5% to 57.5% and introduced a more equitable, multi-criteria horizontal distribution formula, factoring in population, poverty, revenue generation, and inverse population density. This shift away from a population-only formula was a long-standing demand of smaller provinces and a key step towards greater fiscal decentralisation and equity. A higher and more predictable provincial share not only enhances fiscal autonomy but also supports efforts to reduce regional disparities and promote balanced development.

• National Economic Council (NEC) and Other Coordination Mechanisms

In addition to the CCI and NFC, the National Economic Council (NEC), established under Article 156, plays a consultative role in shaping macroeconomic policy. Chaired by the Prime Minister and comprising Chief Ministers and other nominated members, the NEC advises on national economic conditions and development plans. Although primarily advisory, it provides an important platform for federal–provincial coordination in economic planning and development priorities. Other supporting mechanisms include the Ministry of Inter-Provincial Coordination, a dedicated federal ministry tasked with facilitating intergovernmental communication and collaboration. Legislative forums such as the National and Provincial Assemblies remain central to policymaking and debate, while the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court and provincial High Courts, serves as an essential arbiter in interpreting constitutional provisions related to federalism and resolving intergovernmental disputes. Together, these institutions and mechanisms provide the scaffolding for a functional, cooperative, and equitable federation under Pakistan’s constitutional framework.

4. Major Issues and Challenges in Centre-Province Relations

Despite constitutional provisions and institutional mechanisms, centre-province relations in Pakistan remain perpetually strained by several enduring challenges.

4.1. Fiscal and Administrative Autonomy

One of the most fundamental and contentious challenges facing federalism in Pakistan is the issue of fiscal and administrative autonomy. Provinces remain heavily reliant on federal transfers through the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award for their financial solvency, limiting their capacity for independent fiscal planning and local resource mobilisation.

• Financial Dependency: Persistent delays in finalizing NFC Awards create uncertainty for provincial budgeting. Despite the multi-criteria formula of the 7th NFC Award, horizontal imbalances persist, and provinces express grievances over perceived inequities relative to their contributions.
• Taxation Constraints: Provinces possess limited taxation powers and a narrow tax base. Demands for greater authority over sales tax on services are central to ongoing devolution debates.
• Administrative Friction: The presence of federally recruited All-Pakistan Services officers in provincial administrations fuels friction. Provinces argue this undermines local control and accountability, as these officers ultimately report to the federal establishment.
• The Post-18th Amendment Capacity Gap: While the abolition of the Concurrent Legislative List was transformative, provinces have struggled to manage sectors like education and health due to bureaucratic resistance and lack of institutional infrastructure.

4.2. Distribution of Natural Resources

The distribution of natural resources remains a highly sensitive and politically charged issue, particularly for resource-rich yet underdeveloped provinces like Balochistan, Sindh, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Producing provinces demand higher royalties and greater control over oil and gas exploration and production, citing Article 158, which prioritises the rights of the province where the well is situated. Water resource management is another source of chronic dispute, particularly between Sindh and Punjab. These tensions are managed, albeit imperfectly, by the Indus River System Authority (IRSA), with ongoing debates over equitable sharing, water scarcity, and the construction of controversial dams. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a major hydropower producer, regularly demands higher net hydel profit as constitutionally guaranteed, yet feels shortchanged in practice. Similarly, Balochistan’s vast mineral wealth has historically yielded minimal returns to the province’s exchequer, deepening resentment and fuelling long-standing demands for more control and equitable benefit-sharing. The inequitable exploitation of natural resources continues to feed a deep sense of marginalisation and alienation among these provinces.

4.3. Law and Order and Internal Security

In terms of law and order and internal security, although these are constitutionally provincial subjects, federal intervention remains frequent, particularly in cases of terrorism, insurgency, or large-scale civil unrest. This often becomes a flashpoint for debates about the limits of federal authority and the erosion of provincial autonomy. The role of federal law enforcement agencies such as the Rangers and the Frontier Corps within provincial territories is particularly contentious, with provinces sometimes perceiving their involvement as an infringement on their jurisdiction. While these interventions may be justified on grounds of national security, they often result in tension between provincial governments and the federal establishment, especially in politically sensitive or volatile regions.

4.4. Identity Politics and Regional Disparities

Identity politics and regional disparities further complicate centre-province relations in Pakistan. The country’s multi-ethnic makeup often manifests in strong provincial identities and ethno-nationalist movements. Perceived injustices in resource distribution, under-representation in federal institutions, or regional neglect in development policies frequently fuel such movements, including longstanding calls for a separate Seraiki province and the continued unrest in Balochistan. Massive socio-economic disparities between and within provinces exacerbate these issues, reinforcing narratives of exclusion and marginalisation. In this context, even constitutionally symbolic roles such as the Provincial Governor, whose powers were significantly curtailed post-18th Amendment, can be seen as instruments of central influence, particularly during times of political tension. These perceptions undermine trust and complicate efforts toward a more equitable federal structure.

4.5. Provincial Capacity Constraints

Finally, provincial capacity constraints remain a major obstacle in realising the full potential of the 18th Amendment. Many provinces struggle to manage the increased responsibilities that devolution has brought, particularly in complex sectors such as higher education, public health, and local governance. There is a shortage of qualified personnel, institutional infrastructure, and experience in areas like policy formulation, regulatory oversight, and financial management. These deficiencies result in poor service delivery, fragmented policy implementation, and underutilisation of available fiscal resources. In some cases, the capacity gap has even led to demands for the re-centralisation of certain functions, especially when provinces are seen as failing to fulfil their devolved mandates. Despite the formal transfer of power, genuine empowerment remains contingent on building the institutional and human resource capabilities required to govern effectively at the provincial level.

CSS Solved Past Papers from 2010 to Date by Miss Iqra Ali

Explore CSS solved past papers (2010 to Date) by Miss Iqra Ali, featuring detailed answers, examiner-focused content, and updated solutions. Perfect for aspirants preparing for CSS with accuracy and confidence.

Explore Now

Advertise with Us

5. The 18th Constitutional Amendment (2010) 

The 18th Constitutional Amendment is a watershed moment in Pakistan's constitutional history, ushering in an era of enhanced provincial autonomy. Its unanimous passage reflected a rare national consensus on strengthening democratic federalism.

5.1 Key Features and Their Transformative Impact:

• The abolition of the Concurrent Legislative List (CLL) was the most significant change introduced by the 18th Constitutional Amendment, devolving all 47 subjects previously on the CLL to the provinces. This included crucial sectors like education, health, environment, labour, social welfare, and tourism, granting provinces exclusive legislative authority over these areas. This move fundamentally reshaped governance, empowering provinces to design policies tailored to their specific needs, reducing federal legislative dominance, and necessitating the establishment of robust provincial departments and regulatory bodies.
• The enhanced provincial share in the NFC Award, although part of the 7th NFC Award finalised just before the 18th Amendment, was deeply aligned with the spirit of devolution. The increase in the provincial share from 47.5% to 57.5% in the divisible pool represented a major stride towards fiscal decentralisation, significantly boosting provincial financial resources and reducing their reliance on discretionary federal grants, thereby providing greater fiscal space for development.
• The strengthening of the Council of Common Interests (CCI) was another landmark feature. The Amendment mandated regular quarterly meetings of the CCI and, crucially, made its decisions binding on both the federal and provincial governments. It elevated the CCI into a more potent and effective constitutional forum for resolving inter-provincial and centre-province disputes, particularly regarding shared resources and national policy coordination. It significantly enhanced the provincial chief ministers' voice in national decision-making.
• The renaming of NWFP to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was a symbolic yet politically significant change. It addressed a long-standing demand of the Pashtun community, recognising and affirming provincial identities, and contributing to a stronger sense of inclusion and recognition within the federal structure.
• Additionally, the Amendment introduced checks on presidential powers, most notably by repealing Article 58(2)(b), which had allowed the President to dissolve Parliament at his discretion. This significantly limited federal executive overreach and strengthened parliamentary supremacy, thereby fostering greater political stability and reducing the Centre's arbitrary power over elected governments. Finally, the Amendment included specific provisions for the protection of provincial autonomy, ensuring that federal legislation would not derogate from provincial authority without due constitutional process, further embedding the principles of federalism in Pakistan’s governance structure.

6. Achievements and Lingering Challenges Post-18th Amendment

The 18th Constitutional Amendment marked a transformative shift in Pakistan’s federal structure by significantly enhancing provincial autonomy. It empowered provincial legislatures with broader legislative and administrative authority, enabling them to play a more central role in governance. Fiscal transfers to provinces increased substantially, creating opportunities for regionally driven development. The revitalised Council of Common Interests (CCI) improved intergovernmental coordination and institutionalised a formal mechanism for dialogue between the Centre and provinces. Collectively, these reforms contributed to strengthening national cohesion by addressing long-standing grievances and promoting a more inclusive federal compact.

However, several critical challenges continue to hinder the full realisation of the amendment’s objectives. Implementation gaps persist due to bureaucratic resistance, vague jurisdictional boundaries, and insufficient transitional planning. Despite increased fiscal transfers, provinces still face revenue generation constraints and rely heavily on federal funds, while inter-provincial disparities in development remain pronounced. Centralising tendencies endure through federal control over services, major projects, and foreign aid, diluting provincial authority. Additionally, limited institutional capacity in many provinces undermines their ability to manage devolved responsibilities effectively. Unresolved disputes over natural resources and the intrusive role of federal agencies in provincial domains further strain Centre-province relations and demand more structured, consensus-based reforms.

7. Prospects and Recommendations for a Stronger Federation

To transform Pakistan into a truly stable, prosperous, and cohesive federation, the reforms initiated through the 18th Constitutional Amendment must be consolidated with sustained and strategic efforts. Strengthening constitutional institutions such as the Council of Common Interests (CCI) and National Finance Commission (NFC) is essential. The CCI must meet quarterly as mandated and evolve into a proactive platform for policy coordination and dispute resolution. Timely formation and finalisation of NFC Awards are equally crucial. These should progressively increase the provincial share and refine distribution formulas to address long-standing regional inequities and promote balanced national development.

• Fiscal decentralisation remains at the heart of effective federalism. Provinces must broaden their own-source revenue streams by reforming tax policies, improving collection systems, and introducing new taxation avenues like property and agriculture. Harmonising federal and provincial tax regimes would reduce inefficiencies and avoid overlaps. Alongside this, provinces should be granted greater autonomy in utilising federal transfers to align fiscal resources with local priorities, free from excessive central conditionalities that often hinder innovation and responsiveness.
• Building strong and capable provincial institutions is imperative to make devolution meaningful. This entails investing in civil service training across newly devolved sectors, strengthening legislative and regulatory competencies, and improving project management capabilities. Enhanced digital governance and modern data systems can further support efficient service delivery. In parallel, addressing regional and inter-provincial disparities through targeted development plans, special financial packages, and collaborative infrastructure projects is vital to mitigate grievances and foster a sense of inclusive growth across all provinces.
• Clarity in legislative and administrative domains is essential for a harmonious federation. Ambiguities stemming from the abolition of the Concurrent Legislative List should be resolved to clearly define jurisdictional responsibilities. Federal-provincial coordination mechanisms must be institutionalised for joint policy areas like national security, climate change, and trade. Reforms in the structure and deployment of the All-Pakistan Services should align with the principles of provincial autonomy. Simultaneously, a mature political culture is vital. Regular inter-provincial conferences should be institutionalised to foster trust and policy learning.

• Finally, the full realisation of federalism requires empowering local governments with meaningful administrative and financial authority to strengthen grassroots democracy. The judiciary should actively uphold the constitutional spirit of federalism by interpreting disputes impartially and clarifying jurisdictional ambiguities. Addressing natural resource grievances is also critical; transparent and equitable sharing of resource royalties and inclusive water management policies are needed to avoid conflict. More broadly, policies must promote national cohesion by balancing national identity with respect for Pakistan's ethnic and regional diversity, ensuring equitable representation of all provinces in federal institutions and decision-making bodies.

  

  3.5-Month Extensive Compulsory Subjects Course for CSS Aspirants

  Struggling with CSS Compulsory subjects? Crack Pakistan Affairs, Islamiat, GSA & Current Affairs in just 3.5 months with Howfiv’s expert-led course. New batches every April, August & December! Secure your spot now – WhatsApp 0300-6322446!

  Join Now

  Advertise with Us

8. Conclusion

Centre-province relations in Pakistan represent a continuous and often arduous journey towards a mature federal system. While the historical trajectory has largely been characterised by a dominant Centre, the 18th Constitutional Amendment stands as a momentous stride towards empowering provinces and establishing a more equitable federal balance. This landmark reform has significantly expanded provincial autonomy in legislative, administrative, and fiscal spheres, leading to a more decentralised governance structure. However, the full realisation of a harmonious and robust federation remains an ongoing endeavour. Persistent challenges -ranging from fiscal imbalances and administrative control to unresolved natural resource disputes and provincial capacity gaps- underscore the need for sustained constitutional implementation, robust institutional strengthening, and unwavering political will. Addressing these multifaceted issues through collaborative dialogue, equitable resource allocation, genuine commitment to further devolution, and fostering a culture of mutual respect is not merely a matter of administrative efficiency. It is a fundamental prerequisite for ensuring Pakistan's long-term political stability, fostering inclusive economic prosperity, and consolidating national cohesion. A truly mature federal system, where provinces operate as empowered partners rather than subservient entities, is indispensable for unlocking Pakistan's immense potential and securing a prosperous and harmonious future for all its citizens.

Relevant CSS Pakistan Affairs Past Questions 

Here are examples of questions related to Centre-Province Relations that have frequently appeared in various forms in the CSS Pakistan Affairs papers over the past three decades:

1. Critically evaluate the nature of Centre-Province relations in Pakistan, highlighting the major issues and challenges that have historically plagued this relationship.
2. Discuss the salient features and significance of the 18th Constitutional Amendment with particular reference to its impact on provincial autonomy in Pakistan. What are its achievements and lingering challenges?"
3. Analyse the role of the National Finance Commission (NFC) in fostering fiscal federalism in Pakistan. What are the criticisms and demands associated with the NFC Award from the provinces?
4. Examine the constitutional framework governing Centre-Province relations in Pakistan under the 1973 Constitution. How effectively have constitutional institutions like the CCI functioned?
5. To what extent has the devolution of powers under the 18th Amendment strengthened federalism in Pakistan? Discuss the areas where further reforms are needed.
6. Natural resource distribution has been a consistent source of tension between the Centre and provinces in Pakistan. Discuss the grievances of resource-rich provinces and propose solutions.
7. Discuss the administrative and legislative challenges faced by provinces post-18th Amendment. How can provincial capacity be enhanced for effective governance?"
8. Identity politics and regional disparities often exacerbate Centre-Province tensions in Pakistan. Discuss this assertion with relevant examples.
9. Compare and contrast the approaches of various Pakistani governments towards Centre-Province relations since 1973. Which approach has been most conducive to federal harmony?
10. What is the significance of the Council of Common Interests (CCI) in resolving inter-provincial disputes and fostering harmony? Analyse its effectiveness before and after the 18th Amendment.