Since its inception, Pakistan has grappled with a profound identity crisis, rooted not only in ideological ambiguity but in the state’s contradictory political journey between Islamic aspirations and secular administrative structures. While the creation of Pakistan was undeniably linked to a religious motivation, particularly the protection and promotion of Muslim identity, the state’s early leadership and constitutional trajectory veered toward secular and Western democratic norms. This duality has persisted over decades, with attempts to reconcile the Islamic vision of the state with modern governance repeatedly causing political discord and undermining institutional stability.
Follow Cssprepforum WhatsApp Channel: Pakistan’s Largest CSS, PMS Prep Community updated
Led by Sir Syed Kazim Ali, Cssprepforum helps 70,000+ aspirants monthly with top-tier CSS/PMS content. Follow our WhatsApp Channel for solved past papers, expert articles, and free study resources shared by qualifiers and high scorers.
At the core of Pakistan’s identity struggle is the question of governance, that is, what role Islam should play in the political framework of the state. From the very outset, the Muslim League leadership faced the immense challenge of transforming a religiously mobilized movement into a viable modern nation-state. The narrative of Muslim nationalism that led to Pakistan’s creation was often framed in Islamic terms, appealing to the Muslim masses who felt culturally and politically marginalized within a Hindu majority India. However, once independence was achieved, this narrative collided with the secular and democratic vision held by the state’s founding father, Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
Jinnah’s speeches underscored religious tolerance, individual freedom, and equal citizenship, reflecting a democratic spirit that often conflicted with the expectations of religious groups who envisioned an overtly Islamic state. His insistence on separating religion from the functions of the state placed him at odds with the very forces that had mobilized mass support for partition. These ideological contradictions created an initial fault line between secular liberals and religious conservatives, which would deepen over time.
The first serious attempt to define the state’s Islamic character came with the passage of the Objectives Resolution in 1949 under Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan. It symbolized an effort to strike a balance, incorporating Islamic principles while retaining democratic ideals. On one hand, the resolution declared that sovereignty belonged to Allah, thereby asserting divine authority as the basis of law. On the other hand, it committed the state to democratic governance and protection of minorities. This duality, however, laid the foundation for prolonged ideological confusion by committing to mutually conflicting principles, both divine and democratic, without a clear operational framework.
The dilemma intensified with the death of Jinnah in 1948 and the subsequent assassination of Liaquat Ali Khan in 1951. Without the guidance of its charismatic founding leaders, Pakistan’s polity descended into factionalism. Ethnic, sectarian, and ideological cleavages widened. The 1953 anti Ahmadi riots, largely driven by sectarian groups, exposed the inability of the state to maintain religious neutrality or enforce a coherent vision of Islamic governance. The absence of a unitary national leader after Jinnah meant that no consensus could be forged on how Islam should influence law, politics, and civil rights. This leadership vacuum hindered not only political stability but also the development of a consistent ideological framework.
In this vacuum, Pakistan’s political elite vacillated between Islamization and secular modernization. Military and civilian leaders attempted to mould the state according to their preferred models. President Ayub Khan’s regime from 1958 to 1969 for instance emphasized modernization inspired by Western ideals including industrialization, capitalism, and a secular administrative order. His regime’s legal and social policies echoed the reformist vision of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan which advocated for Muslim progress within a Western framework. Ayub’s government symbolized the first institutional pushback against the growing demands of Islamists. He curtailed religious political parties, introduced family laws that were controversial among conservatives, and emphasized science and technology over theological studies.
However, Ayub’s secularizing efforts met resistance and subsequent leaders oscillated in the opposite direction. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto introduced Islamic socialism in the 1970s, blending progressive populism with selective Islamic symbolism. His government nationalized industries, banned alcohol, and declared Friday a holiday in a move to appease Islamic sentiments. Yet Bhutto's reforms did little to provide ideological clarity. Instead, they sparked further divisions by manipulating religious rhetoric for political gain, thereby diluting both ideological purity and policy effectiveness.
Then came General Zia ul Haq whose regime represented the most comprehensive Islamization effort in Pakistan’s history. Through the introduction of Shariah based laws, establishment of Federal Shariat Courts, and promotion of Islamic banking, Zia endeavored to institutionalize Islam as the foundation of the state. His regime tied the state’s legitimacy to religious doctrine, reshaping educational curricula, legal structures, and cultural norms. Zia’s attempt to merge religion with governance further polarized society, increasing the ideological burden on future regimes to either carry forward or undo his legacy.
The pendulum swung once again when General Pervez Musharraf came to power in 1999, promoting a vision of enlightened moderation. His policy sought to undo the rigid conservatism of Zia’s era by encouraging liberal economic reforms, women’s empowerment, and interfaith tolerance. Yet, Musharraf’s top down modernization, often viewed as externally driven and elite oriented, also failed to reconcile the competing expectations of Pakistan’s deeply divided polity. The result was not ideological clarity but further fragmentation.
The enduring paradox of Pakistan’s governance model is rooted in the foundational compromise between its Islamic origin and secular administration. The state has repeatedly tried to straddle both worlds, invoking Islam to derive legitimacy while relying on Western legal frameworks and democratic norms to govern. This duality has not only stunted the development of a coherent constitutional order but has also left the populace confused about the moral and ideological compass of the nation.
Moreover, this ambiguity continues to affect Pakistan’s domestic stability and international standing. Externally, the lack of a clear ideological posture complicates foreign policy, especially in dealing with the West, the Muslim world, and multilateral institutions. Domestically, the unresolved identity question manifests in educational divides, legal inconsistencies, sectarian violence, and policy paralysis.
The Constitution of 1973, while democratic in form, enshrined several Islamic provisions, including the requirement that the head of state be a Muslim and the definition of a Muslim citizen. These clauses have often been interpreted by hardline elements to marginalize minority communities and restrict political participation, leading to social and legal discrimination. Even today, debates over the status of minority sects, blasphemy laws, and the role of religion in education continue to reflect this ideological dissonance.
It is worth noting that many postcolonial Muslim states have faced similar dilemmas in defining the role of religion in governance. Yet, in Pakistan’s case, the problem has been compounded by the state's recurring use of Islam as a political tool rather than a unifying moral vision. Political actors have often invoked religious rhetoric during periods of instability or to gain electoral mileage, only to abandon it when pursuing pragmatic governance or global cooperation.
CSS Solved Past Papers from 2010 to Date by Miss Iqra Ali
Explore CSS solved past papers (2010 to Date) by Miss Iqra Ali, featuring detailed answers, examiner-focused content, and updated solutions. Perfect for aspirants preparing for CSS with accuracy and confidence.
To move forward, Pakistan needs a new consensus on the nature of its state identity, one that goes beyond the binary of Islamic versus secular. This requires honest public discourse, historical introspection, and inclusive constitutional reform. A reexamination of the Objectives Resolution, its place in constitutional law, and its interpretation by the judiciary could be the starting point. A state cannot function effectively with a split ideological personality. The tension between being a republic governed by elected representatives and a state guided by divine law must be resolved through democratic means and public dialogue.
Without ideological clarity, no governance structure, whether democratic or theocratic, can function with legitimacy or efficiency. For Pakistan, the price of ambiguity has been decades of instability, institutional weakness, and societal division. The task of reconciling the Islamic spirit of its foundation with the pluralistic, modern demands of the present remains unfinished. But it is not impossible.
