Follow Cssprepforum WhatsApp Channel Follow Now

Critically evaluate Pakistan's role and commitment to the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), discussing the factors hindering its effectiveness and the potential for regional integration.

Aroosa Nargis Zarkoon

Aroosa Nargis Zarkoon, a writer from Kohlu, is Sir Syed Kazim Ali's student.

View Author

21 September 2026

|

323

The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) was envisioned as a beacon of regional integration, yet its journey has been fraught with challenges. Despite Pakistan's consistent advocacy for its objectives, the organization remains largely constrained by deep-seated bilateral tensions, particularly between India and Pakistan. This detailed analysis delves into SAARC's foundational principles, its limited achievements, and the profound failures that have hindered its potential. Discover the complex web of political will, trust deficits, and economic disparities that define SAARC's current state, and explore the pathways towards a more integrated and prosperous South Asia.

Critically evaluate Pakistan's role and commitment to the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), discussing the factors hindering its effectiveness and the potential for regional integration.

1- Introduction

The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) stands as a pivotal intergovernmental organization and geopolitical union of nations in South Asia. Established with the ambitious goal of fostering economic and regional integration, SAARC represents a collective aspiration for peace, progress, and prosperity in a region home to a quarter of the world's population. For Pakistan, a founding member, SAARC embodies a significant dimension of its foreign policy, offering a platform for multilateral engagement, economic collaboration, and addressing shared challenges. However, despite nearly four decades of existence, SAARC remains arguably the least integrated region globally, plagued by deep-seated political rivalries, economic disparities, and institutional bottlenecks. The unresolved bilateral disputes, particularly between India and Pakistan, have often overshadowed the multilateral agenda, transforming SAARC into a platform often paralyzed by political rancor rather than empowered by cooperative synergy. As Dr. Ishrat Husain, a prominent Pakistani economist, has noted, "The major explanatory factor for this reversal is the paradigm shift in the basic model of development... when economic cooperation and regional integration is very important for the entire region." This highlights the lost opportunities due to regional inertia. This article will explore the immense, yet unrealized, potential for regional integration and outline a pragmatic way forward, highlighting Pakistan's proactive contributions and policy recommendations to revitalize SAARC for the shared prosperity of South Asia.

Follow CPF WhatsApp Channel for Daily Exam Updates

Cssprepforum, led by Sir Syed Kazim Ali, supports 70,000+ monthly aspirants with premium CSS/PMS prep. Follow our WhatsApp Channel for daily CSS/PMS updates, solved past papers, expert articles, and free prep resources.

Follow Channel

2- Overview of SAARC

2.1 Establishment: When, Why, and Under What Context It Was Founded

The idea of regional cooperation in South Asia gained traction in the late 1970s. The then President of Bangladesh, Ziaur Rahman, made formal proposals for a regional organization, which were enthusiastically received by the regional states. After a series of preparatory meetings involving the foreign secretaries and foreign ministers of the seven South Asian countries, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) was formally established on December 8, 1985, with the adoption of its Charter in Dhaka, Bangladesh. This culmination followed intensive diplomatic efforts, including the first official proposal by Bangladeshi President Ziaur Rahman in May 1980, followed by foreign secretary-level meetings from April 1981 in Colombo, and eventually the first summit in Dhaka. The establishment of SAARC stemmed from several compelling reasons and the prevailing geopolitical context:

  • Geographical Proximity and Shared History: The countries of South Asia share a common geographical space, historical experiences (including colonial legacies), and cultural ties, which naturally lend themselves to regional collaboration.
  • Economic Imperatives: Many South Asian countries faced similar socio-economic challenges, including poverty, low economic growth, and underdevelopment. Regional cooperation was seen as a vital tool to accelerate economic progress through increased trade, investment, and joint ventures.
  • Need for Collective Self-Reliance: In an increasingly interdependent world, the member states recognized the importance of pooling resources and expertise to reduce external dependencies and enhance their collective bargaining power on global forums.
  • Promoting Peace and Stability: While bilateral disputes often marred relations, SAARC was envisioned as a platform for fostering mutual understanding, trust, and peaceful resolution of differences, thereby contributing to regional stability.
  • Learning from Other Blocs: The success stories of regional organizations like the European Economic Community (EEC, later EU) and ASEAN provided inspiration and a model for South Asian states to pursue integration.
  • Post-Cold War Context (Emerging): Although founded during the Cold War, the shift towards a unipolar world and increased globalization further emphasized the need for regional blocs to enhance collective resilience and influence.

2.2 Member States

SAARC currently comprises eight member states as depicted in the below given map

Research Paper: SAARC-An Evaluation - Global Defense News - GSDN

Additionally, nine states hold Observer status: Australia, China, the European Union, Iran, Japan, Mauritius, Myanmar, South Korea, and the United States of America.

2.3 Objectives and Principles

The Charter of SAARC outlines its core objectives and guiding principles:

  • Objectives (as per Article I of the SAARC Charter)
  1. To promote the welfare of the peoples of South Asia and to improve their quality of life.
  2. To accelerate economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the region and to provide all individuals the opportunity to live in dignity and to realize their full potentials.
  3. To promote and strengthen collective self-reliance among the countries of South Asia.
  4. To contribute to mutual trust, understanding and appreciation of one another's problems.
  5. To promote active collaboration and mutual assistance in the economic, social, cultural, technical and scientific fields.
  6. To strengthen cooperation with other developing countries.
  7. To bolster cooperation among themselves in international forums on matters of common interest.
  8. To cooperate with international and regional organizations with similar aims and purposes.
  • Principles (as per Article II of the SAARC Charter)
  1. Cooperation within the framework of the Association shall be based on respect for the principles of sovereign equality, territorial integrity, political independence, non-interference in the internal affairs of other Member States and mutual benefit.
  2. Such cooperation shall complement bilateral and multilateral cooperation.
  3. Such cooperation shall not be a substitute for bilateral and multilateral cooperation but shall complement them.
  4. Decisions at all levels shall be taken on the basis of unanimity.
  5. Bilateral and contentious issues shall be excluded from the deliberations of such meetings. This particular principle has often been cited as a major limitation, preventing discussions on the very issues that hinder regional progress.

2.4 Headquarters

The permanent Secretariat of SAARC is located in Kathmandu, Nepal, established on January 16, 1987. It is responsible for coordinating and monitoring the implementation of SAARC activities and serving as a channel of communication between member states.

2.5 Basic Institutional Structure 

SAARC's institutional framework is designed to facilitate decision-making and implementation across various levels:

  1. Summit (Heads of State or Government): This is the highest decision-making body of SAARC. Summits are usually held biennially and provide overall policy direction for the Association. Decisions are taken by unanimity.
  2. Council of Ministers: Comprising the Foreign Ministers of the Member States, the Council formulates policies, reviews progress, and identifies new areas of cooperation. It meets at least twice a year.
  3. Standing Committee: Consisting of the Foreign Secretaries of the Member States, the Standing Committee is responsible for overall monitoring and coordination of SAARC programs, approving projects, and determining inter-sectoral priorities. It meets as often as necessary.
  4. Programming Committee: Comprising senior officials, this committee assists the Standing Committee, especially in financial and programming matters.
  5. Technical Committees: These committees are responsible for implementing SAARC programs in specific agreed-upon areas (e.g., agriculture, health, education, environment, science & technology). They identify project proposals and formulate detailed programs of action.
  6. SAARC Secretariat: Headed by the Secretary-General (appointed by the Council of Ministers from member states for a three-year term on the principle of rotational turn), the Secretariat provides administrative and technical support, monitors program implementation, and acts as a communication hub.
  7. Specialized Bodies/Regional Centres: Over time, SAARC has established various specialized bodies and regional centers to promote cooperation in specific fields. Examples include:
    • SAARC Development Fund (SDF) in Bhutan.
    • South Asian University (SAU) in India.
    • SAARC Arbitration Council (SARCO) in Pakistan.
    • SAARC Disaster Management Centre (SDMC) in India.
    • SAARC Energy Centre (SEC) in Pakistan.
    • SAARC Cultural Centre (SCC) in Sri Lanka.

3- Importance of SAARC for its Member States

SAARC, despite its limitations, holds immense importance for its member states due to the shared socio-economic, geographical, and strategic realities of South Asia.

  • Economic Growth and Poverty Alleviation

    1. The region is home to a significant portion of the world's poor. SAARC offers a framework to collectively address poverty through regional projects, trade liberalization, and shared development experiences.
    2. Trade Potential: Intra-regional trade in South Asia remains remarkably low compared to other regional blocs. SAARC initiatives like SAFTA aim to unlock this potential, leading to higher economic growth, job creation, and diversified markets for member states. According to UNESCAP, intra-regional trade in South Asia is merely around 5-7% of its total trade, a stark contrast to ASEAN's average of over 25% or the European Union's over 60%. This highlights a massive untapped potential, estimated to be as high as $45 billion.
    3. Investment and Infrastructure: Joint ventures, cross-border investments, and shared infrastructure projects (e.g., energy grids, transport corridors) can boost economic activity and improve connectivity, benefiting all members. For instance, projects like the proposed SAARC Regional Railways Agreement and Motor Vehicles Agreement aim to enhance physical connectivity, which is vital for reducing trade costs and fostering greater economic integration.
  • Social and Cultural Development

    1. People-to-People Contact: SAARC initiatives promoting tourism, cultural exchange programs, and easier visa regimes can foster greater understanding and goodwill among the populations, overcoming historical biases. The SAARC Cultural Centre in Sri Lanka regularly organizes cultural festivals, art exhibitions, and youth camps, such as the SAARC Youth Camp and SAARC Folk Heritage Festival, to build cross-cultural understanding.
    2. Shared Challenges: Member states face common social issues such as illiteracy, disease, gender inequality, and food insecurity. SAARC provides a platform for sharing best practices and developing coordinated responses.
    3. Cultural Preservation: Promoting regional cultural heritage through festivals, arts, and educational exchanges reinforces shared identities and mutual respect.
  • Political Stability and Conflict Resolution

    1. Contribute to de-escalation of tensions: While contentious bilateral issues are formally excluded, the SAARC platform offers opportunities for informal dialogues and confidence-building measures at summits and ministerial meetings, which can indirectly contribute to de-escalation of tensions. The informal interactions on the sidelines of SAARC summits have, at times, provided crucial avenues for leaders to engage in dialogue, even when formal channels are strained.
    2. Collective Voice: A united South Asian front can exert greater influence on global issues, such as climate change, trade negotiations, and security concerns, enhancing the region's overall diplomatic leverage.
    3. Counter-Terrorism: The SAARC Convention on Suppression of Terrorism and joint initiatives, though limited, highlight a collective recognition of regional security threats that require coordinated action.
  • Addressing Trans-National Issues

    1. Climate Change: South Asia is highly vulnerable to climate change impacts. SAARC offers a forum to develop common strategies for disaster management, adaptation, and mitigation. The region experiences frequent extreme weather events, such as the devastating floods in Pakistan in 2010 and 2022, and recurring droughts in other parts, underscoring the urgent need for a unified regional climate action plan.
    2. Health: The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for regional health cooperation, vaccine sharing, and collaborative research, an area where SAARC can play a vital role.
    3. Disaster Management: The region is prone to natural disasters. SAARC initiatives like the SDMC facilitate coordinated responses and sharing of expertise.

4- Achievements of SAARC

Despite its structural limitations and internal dynamics, SAARC has achieved several notable milestones and played a significant, albeit understated, role in fostering regional cooperation:

  • Creation of an Institutional Framework: SAARC successfully established a formal platform for dialogue and cooperation among South Asian nations, a significant achievement given the region's complex history. It provided a structure for regular meetings at various levels, from heads of government to technical committees.

4.1 Trade Liberalization Initiatives

  • SAPTA (SAARC Preferential Trading Arrangement - 1993): This was the first step towards a free trade area, offering preferential tariff rates on certain goods.
  • SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area - 2006): SAFTA aimed to reduce tariffs on all traded goods to zero by 2016 for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and 2012 for non-LDCs. While its implementation has been slow, it represents a commitment to regional trade integration.

4.2 Social Development Initiatives

  • SAARC Social Charter (2004): This landmark document outlined commitments to eradicate poverty, promote health, education, women's empowerment, and address other social issues. It demonstrates a collective vision for human development in the region. The Charter encompasses specific targets in areas like poverty alleviation (e.g., reducing poverty by half by 2015, which was largely missed), population stabilization, and promoting the rights of children.
  • Food Bank (2007): The SAARC Food Bank was established to provide food security by maintaining emergency food reserves for the region, especially during natural disasters or food crises. It aims to hold a reserve of 240,000 metric tons of food grains, with India contributing the largest share.
  • Development Fund (SDF - 2010): The SAARC Development Fund aims to fund projects that contribute to the welfare of people in the region, focusing on poverty alleviation, social development, and infrastructure. SDF has funded various projects across member states, focusing on areas like renewable energy, health services, and women's empowerment, with a cumulative project portfolio exceeding $200 million.

4.3 Combating Terrorism

  • SAARC Convention on Suppression of Terrorism (1987): This was a pioneering regional agreement to combat terrorism, demonstrating a collective will to address cross-border threats, even if implementation has been challenging. The Convention committed member states to extradite or prosecute terrorists and enhance intelligence sharing.
  • Additional Protocol (2004): An additional protocol was adopted to update the convention in line with UN Security Council Resolution 1373.

4.4 Promoting People-to-People Contact

  • SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (1992): This scheme facilitates easier travel for certain categories of people (e.g., parliamentarians, judges, journalists) within the region, fostering greater interaction. While limited, it has been a step towards easing travel, albeit often bogged down by stringent national requirements.
  • Cultural Exchange Programs: SAARC has promoted cultural festivals, youth exchanges, and sporting events to enhance mutual understanding and appreciation of diverse cultures.
  • South Asian University (SAU): Established in New Delhi, SAU aims to provide world-class education and research facilities for students and scholars from SAARC member states, promoting academic collaboration. Opened in 2010, SAU offers various postgraduate and doctoral programs, attracting students from all SAARC countries.

4.5 Sector-Specific Cooperation

The establishment of various regional centers (e.g., SAARC Energy Centre, SAARC Disaster Management Centre, SAARC Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS Centre) signifies cooperation in diverse technical and scientific fields.

4.6 COVID-19 Response

 In the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, SAARC leaders held a virtual summit, demonstrating a collective effort to respond to the health crisis and establish a COVID-19 Emergency Fund. India initially pledged $10 million to the fund, followed by contributions from other member states, including Pakistan's pledge of $3 million. This showed the potential for cooperation even amidst political tensions.

5- Failures and Limitations of SAARC

Despite its noble objectives and some achievements, SAARC's journey has been largely characterized by its failures and inherent limitations, preventing it from realizing its full potential as a regional economic and political powerhouse.

  • Dominance of Bilateral Disputes, Especially India-Pakistan Rivalry

This is arguably the most significant impediment. The principle of excluding "bilateral and contentious issues" from formal deliberations means that the very issues that plague regional relations cannot be directly addressed within the SAARC framework. The persistent political tensions, cross-border terrorism allegations, and historical grievances between India and Pakistan have repeatedly stalled SAARC processes, leading to cancelled summits and a general lack of enthusiasm. A prime example is the indefinite postponement of the 19th SAARC Summit, which was to be held in Islamabad in November 2016. India, followed by Bangladesh, Bhutan, and Afghanistan, pulled out citing cross-border terrorism, effectively rendering the summit impossible and highlighting how bilateral animosity can derail the entire organization.

  • Lack of Political Will and Trust Deficit

 Beyond bilateral issues, there is a general lack of strong political will among member states to truly commit to deeper integration. Deep-seated mistrust, historical animosities, and security concerns often override economic and social benefits. As noted by Dr. Maleeha Lodhi, a prominent Pakistani diplomat, "The lack of political will, a trust deficit, and the prevalence of bilateral disputes have prevented SAARC from becoming a dynamic regional organization like ASEAN or the EU."

  • Slow Implementation of Agreements

Even when agreements are reached (e.g., SAFTA), their implementation is often sluggish due to bureaucratic hurdles, protectionist tendencies, and a lack of political commitment. Non-tariff barriers and political considerations continue to impede the free flow of goods, services, and capital. Despite SAFTA aiming for zero tariffs by 2016 for LDCs, significant non-tariff barriers, such as cumbersome customs procedures, lack of mutual recognition of standards, and inadequate transport infrastructure, continue to hinder trade.

  • Asymmetrical Power Dynamics

India's large size, economic might, and central geographical location often create a sense of discomfort and apprehension among smaller member states, who fear Indian hegemony. This asymmetry makes smaller states hesitant to embrace deeper integration that might disproportionately benefit India.

  • Decision-Making by Unanimity

The requirement for unanimous decisions at all levels provides any single member state with veto power, making it extremely difficult to push through ambitious initiatives, especially if they touch upon sensitive national interests or bilateral disputes. This 'unanimity clause' effectively grants a veto to any member, making bolder initiatives virtually impossible when even one member has reservations.

  • Limited Intra-Regional Trade

Intra-SAARC trade remains abysmal, accounting for only around 5-7% of the region's total trade, whereas for ASEAN, it's over 25%, and for the EU, it's over 60%. This clearly indicates the lack of effective economic integration.

  • Overlapping Regional Blocs

Many SAARC members are also part of other regional groupings (e.g., BIMSTEC for India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka; ECO for Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh; SCO for India and Pakistan). This diversification of regional interests can dilute commitment to SAARC.

  • Bureaucratic Hurdles and Weak Secretariat

 The SAARC Secretariat has limited autonomy and resources, often unable to effectively monitor or push for implementation of decisions. Bureaucratic inertia within member states further delays progress.

  • Lack of Tangible Benefits for Citizens

 For the common people in South Asia, the direct, tangible benefits of SAARC have been limited, leading to a perception that the organization is more of a talking shop than a driver of real change.

6- Challenges posed to SAARC

SAARC faces a multitude of challenges that continue to impede its progress and effectiveness:

  • Deep-Rooted Geo-Political Rivalries

 The persistent animosity between India and Pakistan is the most formidable challenge. This rivalry poisons the regional atmosphere, leading to stalled summits, lack of consensus on crucial issues, and preventing any meaningful progress on economic and connectivity initiatives that require cooperation from both. The absence of a SAARC summit since 2014 due to Indo-Pak tensions is a critical indicator of this challenge, effectively putting the organization in a deep freeze.

  • Terrorism and Security Concerns

 Allegations of cross-border terrorism and state-sponsored non-state actors frequently fuel mistrust and security concerns among member states, making cooperation, particularly in sensitive areas, extremely difficult. Pakistan and India frequently exchange accusations regarding support for militant groups, which consistently undermines any attempts at security cooperation within SAARC.

  • Economic Disparities and Protectionism

 The vast economic differences among member states, from large economies, like India (with a GDP of over $3.7 trillion in 2023) to LDCs like Afghanistan (GDP around $14.5 billion in 2023) and Bhutan, make it challenging to create a level playing field for trade and investment. Protectionist policies and fear of market dominance often hinder trade liberalization.

  • Lack of Connectivity and Infrastructure

South Asia suffers from poor intra-regional connectivity, including inadequate road, rail, and maritime links. Political barriers often prevent the development of vital infrastructure projects that could boost trade and people-to-people contact. For example, the proposed SAARC Regional Railways Agreement, aimed at linking member states, has seen minimal progress due to geopolitical sensitivities and lack of consensus.

  • Trust Deficit and Suspicion

    Decades of unresolved disputes, historical narratives, and political rhetoric have created a significant trust deficit. Member states often view each other with suspicion, hindering genuine collaborative efforts. Former Indian Foreign Secretary, Shivshankar Menon, once stated, “SAARC has failed to live up to its promise primarily because the trust deficit among its members remains too high.”

  • Influence of External Powers 

    The involvement and strategic interests of external powers (e.g., China, USA) in the region can sometimes complicate regional dynamics and divert focus from SAARC's objectives. For instance, China's growing economic influence through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Nepal, is viewed differently by India, adding another layer of geopolitical complexity.

  • Internal Political Instability 

    Several SAARC member states have experienced periods of internal political instability, which can divert national attention and resources away from regional commitments and policy implementation.

  • Climate Change and Environmental Degradation

    While these are areas of common interest, the scale of the challenge and the differing capacities of member states make coordinated action difficult. Issues, like trans-boundary water disputes, further complicate environmental cooperation.

  • Non-Tariff Barriers

    Even with tariff reductions under SAFTA, non-tariff barriers e.g., complex customs procedures, lack of harmonization of product standards, stringent import licensing, and inadequate trade facilitation measures continue to restrict trade significantly.

7- Future Prospects of SAARC

Despite the numerous challenges and past failures, the idea of regional cooperation in South Asia remains compelling due to shared geography, culture, and common socio-economic challenges. SAARC's future prospects, though dim in the short term due to political stalemates, hold potential under certain conditions:

  • Focus on Non-Contentious Areas (Sectoral Cooperation)

 If comprehensive integration proves elusive, SAARC could revitalize by focusing on less contentious, technical areas where cooperation offers clear mutual benefits. This includes:

  • Climate Change and Disaster Management: Given South Asia’s acute vulnerability to extreme weather events, joint initiatives establishing real-time early warning systems, cross-border resource sharing for disaster relief, and collaborative research on climate-resilient agriculture can mitigate shared existential threats without triggering political friction.
  • Health Cooperation: Building on the foundational mechanisms witnessed during global health crises, SAARC can institutionalize joint disease surveillance networks, streamline regional vaccine manufacturing and distribution channels, and promote cross-border healthcare infrastructure development.
  • Tourism and Cultural Exchange: Establishing regional tourism circuits, liberalizing visa regimes for academic and cultural delegates, and hosting joint heritage festivals can actively dismantle socio-cultural stereotypes, foster economic linkages, and deepen people-to-people connectivity.
  • Energy Cooperation: Capitalizing on the asymmetric distribution of natural resources across member states, SAARC can accelerate the creation of integrated regional energy grids, promote joint ventures in renewable energy development, and establish formalized energy-trading markets to resolve the region's chronic power deficits.
  • Multi-Speed Integration

Adopting a "multi-speed" or "variable geometry" approach would allow willing member states to move forward with deeper integration in specific sectors without being constrained by the unanimity rule. By enabling progressive subsets of nations to sign bilateral or sub-regional agreements, such as transport, trade, or digital connectivity corridor initiatives, SAARC can create successful operational models that demonstrate tangible economic benefits, thereby incentivizing hesitant members to opt in later without stalling overall regional momentum. 

  • Role of Track-II Diplomacy and Civil Society

When formal diplomatic channels (Track-I) face paralysis, informal engagement mechanisms become vital for maintaining institutional memory and dialogue. Non-governmental organizations, policy think tanks, academic institutions, and business federations can operate as critical bridge-builders. By convening Track-II policy dialogues, conducting joint research, and advocating for cross-border trade facilitation, civil society can generate pragmatic policy frameworks and sustain constructive discourse until political conditions allow official re-engagement. 

  • Leveraging Observer States

SAARC can significantly enhance its developmental capacity by systematically engaging its observer states, including major economic powerhouses such as China, Japan, the European Union, and the United States. Rather than treating observer status as merely diplomatic participation, SAARC can structure co-investment frameworks where these partners provide critical capital, advanced technology, and technical expertise for large-scale infrastructure, connectivity, and environmental management projects across the region. 

  • Reforming Decision-Making Process

A major structural bottleneck within SAARC is its foundational requirement for absolute unanimity, which effectively allows any single member state to veto regional initiatives. While structural amendment is politically complex, introducing flexible mechanisms such as "consensus minus one" or sector-specific voting protocols could prevent bilateral deadlocks from holding the entire regional agenda hostage, thereby safeguarding the organization's institutional efficiency. 

  • Addressing Trust Deficit

Technical and economic cooperation cannot yield sustainable results without addressing the deep-seated psychological and historical mistrust among member states. Institutionalizing robust Confidence-Building Measures (CBMs), such as military-to-military communications, transparent intelligence-sharing on non-traditional security threats, and media-exchange programs, can help counter hostile national narratives and incrementally restore the baseline trust required for high-level diplomatic consensus. 

  • Renewed Political Will

Ultimately, the future trajectory of SAARC hinges entirely on the strategic vision and political commitment of its member states, most notably India and Pakistan, to elevate collective regional prosperity above bilateral grievances. Without a conscious decision by regional leadership to compartmentalize persistent geopolitical disputes, SAARC will struggle to achieve its potential; conversely, even a modest diplomatic breakthrough between its largest economies would immediately catalyze regional integration and transform South Asia's developmental landscape. 

8- Role of Pakistan in SAARC

Pakistan, as a founding member of SAARC, has consistently emphasized its commitment to regional cooperation, viewing SAARC as a crucial platform for economic development, cultural exchange, and promoting peace and stability in South Asia. However, its role has been significantly shaped by its complex relationship with India.

  • Advocate for Regional Cooperation

From its inception, Pakistan has been a strong advocate for SAARC, believing that regional integration is essential for the collective uplift of South Asian peoples. It actively participated in the preparatory meetings that led to SAARC's formation.

  • Emphasis on Economic and Social Cooperation

 Pakistan has consistently pushed for deeper economic integration, including trade liberalization, energy cooperation, and joint ventures, within the SAARC framework. It has highlighted the potential for poverty alleviation and social development through collective efforts. Pakistan has often stressed the need to remove non-tariff barriers and allow unhindered movement of goods and services to fully realize the potential of SAFTA.

  • Proposals for Connectivity

Pakistan has often put forth proposals for enhancing regional connectivity, including road, rail, and energy corridors, recognizing its geo-strategic location as a bridge between South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East. For example, Pakistan has advocated for projects like the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) pipeline within a broader regional energy cooperation framework, and improved road links to Central Asia through Afghanistan.

  • Support for SAFTA Implementation

 Pakistan, despite its own trade imbalances, has voiced commitment to the SAFTA agreement and reducing trade barriers, though practical implementation has been slow due to various factors, including non-tariff barriers and political issues.

  • Hosting SAARC Institutions

 Pakistan has hosted key SAARC institutions, such as the SAARC Arbitration Council (SARCO) in Islamabad, established in 2009, and the SAARC Energy Centre (SEC) in Islamabad, established in 2006, demonstrating its institutional commitment to the organization.

  • Stance on Bilateralism vs. Multilateralism

 While India often prefers bilateral resolution of disputes, Pakistan has consistently advocated for SAARC to act as a more robust multilateral forum. However, Pakistan also stresses that the SAARC Charter's principle of non-inclusion of bilateral and contentious issues should be respected. Pakistani leaders have frequently underscored that "SAARC cannot realize its full potential until the spirit of cooperation transcends the limitations imposed by bilateral tensions."

  • Impact of India-Pakistan Relations

 Pakistan's engagement with SAARC has been profoundly affected by its relations with India. When tensions are high, Pakistan often finds itself in a difficult position, sometimes leading to its non-participation or reservations about SAARC initiatives that it perceives as Indian-dominated or not in its national interest. The indefinite postponement of the 19th SAARC Summit, which was to be held in Islamabad in 2016, due to India's boycott (following the Uri attack), is a prime example of how bilateral issues directly halt SAARC processes. This postponement, widely seen as a consequence of the heightened tensions following the Uri terror attack, effectively put the SAARC process into a prolonged dormancy, from which it is yet to fully recover.

  • Focus on Non-Political Areas

 When political deadlocks occur, Pakistan, like other members, often emphasizes cooperation in non-political areas like health, environment, culture, and disaster management to keep the spirit of SAARC alive.

  • Call for Timely Summits

 Pakistan has repeatedly called for the timely holding of SAARC Summits, recognizing their importance for providing overall policy direction and reviewing progress. The absence of summits since 2014 has been a major concern for Pakistan. "The non-convening of SAARC Summits for almost a decade is a serious blow to regionalism in South Asia," a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary lamented, urging for renewed commitment to the SAARC Charter.

  • Concerns over Indian Hegemony

 Pakistan, along with other smaller SAARC members, has at times expressed concerns regarding the asymmetrical power dynamics within SAARC, particularly India's dominant role, and has sought a more equitable framework for cooperation. Critics from Pakistan often point to India's preference for sub-regional groupings (like BIMSTEC) as an Preempt to bypass SAARC and exert its influence without fully addressing the concerns of all SAARC members.

  • Position on Afghanistan's Membership

Pakistan played an active role in advocating for Afghanistan's inclusion as a full member in SAARC in 2007, aiming to broaden the regional scope and connectivity. In essence, Pakistan's role in SAARC is characterized by a commitment to regional integration tempered by the geopolitical realities and its complex bilateral relationship with India. While Pakistan genuinely desires a functional and effective SAARC, the persistent political deadlocks have often curtailed its ability to fully realize its aspirations for regional cooperation.

9- Suggestions to Revive SAARC

To revitalize SAARC and unlock its true potential for regional integration, several concrete steps and shifts in approach are necessary. These suggestions aim to address the fundamental issues that have hindered its effectiveness:

9.1 Address the Trust Deficit and Resolve Bilateral Disputes (especially India-Pakistan)

  • Sustained Dialogue: The most critical step is for India and Pakistan to resume meaningful and uninterrupted dialogue to address their core disputes, including Kashmir and cross-border terrorism. Without a significant improvement in this bilateral relationship, SAARC will remain largely dysfunctional.
  • Confidence-Building Measures (CBMs): Implement and expand CBMs in all sectors (military, economic, cultural) to build trust and reduce suspicion.
  • De-linking SAARC from Bilateral Politics: While challenging, member states, particularly India and Pakistan, should make a conscious effort to separate SAARC's multilateral agenda from their bilateral grievances, allowing regional cooperation to proceed independently. This approach, often termed 'functional cooperation,' advocates for progress in less contentious areas even amidst political differences.

9.2 Prioritize Economic Integration and Connectivity

  • Full Implementation of SAFTA: Remove remaining tariff and non-tariff barriers, simplify customs procedures, and harmonize standards to ensure SAFTA's full potential is realized. This includes addressing complex rules of origin and facilitating transit trade, especially for landlocked members.
  • Energy Corridors: Accelerate the development of regional energy grids and gas pipelines e.g., TAPI pipeline to address energy deficits collaboratively.
  • Transport Connectivity: Invest in and operationalize road, rail, and maritime links across the region (e.g., motor vehicle agreements, railway links) to facilitate trade and movement of people.
  • Digital Connectivity: Enhance digital infrastructure and cooperation to foster e-commerce and a regional digital economy.

9.3 Strengthen Institutional Mechanisms

  • Empower the SAARC Secretariat: Grant the Secretariat greater autonomy, resources, and a more proactive role in initiating projects, monitoring implementation, and advocating for regional goals. Currently, the Secretariat's role is largely administrative; empowering it with more executive functions could enhance its effectiveness.
  • Review Decision-Making Process: While unanimity is enshrined, exploring alternative decision-making models for less sensitive areas e.g., consensus minus one/two, qualified majority voting for specific technical issues could facilitate progress.
  • Regular Summits: Ensure the timely and consistent holding of SAARC Summits, as these are crucial for setting the direction and providing impetus to regional cooperation.

9.4 Focus on Non-Contentious / Technical Cooperation

  • Climate Change and Disaster Management: Develop robust regional frameworks for climate resilience, adaptation strategies, early warning systems, and coordinated disaster response mechanisms.
  • Health Collaboration: Enhance cooperation on disease surveillance, public health emergencies, vaccine development, and sharing of medical expertise.
  • Food Security: Strengthen the SAARC Food Bank and explore joint agricultural research and development initiatives to ensure food security for the region's growing population.
  • Tourism and Cultural Promotion: Liberalize visa regimes for tourists, develop regional tourism packages, and promote cultural exchange programs to foster greater interaction and understanding.

9.5 Promote People-to-People Contact

  • Liberal Visa Regimes: Expand the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme to more categories and simplify visa application processes for students, researchers, business people, and general tourists.
  • Educational and Youth Exchanges: Encourage more student scholarships, faculty exchanges, and youth summits to build a future generation of South Asians who understand and appreciate each other.
  • Media and Cultural Exchanges: Facilitate greater flow of media content, cultural performances, and artistic collaborations to break down stereotypes and build cultural bridges.

9.6 Engage Civil Society and Private Sector

Bypassing state-level political paralysis requires SAARC to systematically integrate non-state actors, such as business chambers, think tanks, and academic consortia, into its operational framework. These entities provide market agility, technical expertise, and cross-border networks capable of driving organic, "bottom-up" economic and social integration. Institutionalizing Track-II dialogues, joint research, and regional trade expos builds pragmatic cross-border linkages that sustain functional cooperation and maintain institutional momentum even during formal diplomatic standoffs. 

9.7 Leverage Observer Status Effectively

SAARC must shift its relationship with observer entities, including China, Japan, the EU, and the US, from symbolic summit attendance to structured, project-based partnerships. By developing co-financing and technical frameworks, SAARC can draw on external capital and technological capabilities to address critical regional deficits in infrastructure, energy grids, and climate resilience. Managed through transparent, multilateral SAARC mechanisms, these external investments can accelerate regional development goals while safeguarding the collective autonomy of member states. 

10- Comparative Analysis with ASEAN, ECO, and EU

Comparing SAARC with other regional organizations provides valuable insights into its challenges and potential lessons.

10.1 SAARC vs. ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations)

 

Comparison AspectASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations)SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation)
Integration LevelHigh: Deep economic integration with high intra-regional trade and cohesive political coordination.Low: Minimal intra-regional trade and weak institutional integration across member states.
Trust & CohesionStrong: High degree of mutual trust and political consensus despite diverse political systems.Weak: Deep-seated historical mistrust and persistent geopolitical friction hinder collective progress.
Dispute ManagementEffective: Functional informal mechanisms prevent bilateral disputes from derailing the regional agenda.Ineffective: Bilateral political rivalries routinely paralyze organizational functioning and summits.
External EngagementProactive: Engages major powers collectively (e.g., ASEAN+3, EAS), enhancing regional leverage.Fragmented: Internal divisions prevent a unified posture or cohesive strategic dialogue with global powers.
Economic Focus & ProgressAdvanced: Substantial economic liberalization, trade harmonization, and regional infrastructure connectivity.Stagnant: Slow implementation of trade agreements (e.g., SAFTA) due to protectionism and political barriers.
Core Structural DifferenceConsensus-Driven: Operates smoothly due to the absence of a dominant bilateral rivalry and strict non-interference.Rivalry-Ridden: Dominated and paralyzed by the persistent India-Pakistan bilateral conflict.

 

 

 

 

10.2 SAARC vs. ECO (Economic Cooperation Organization)

 

Comparison AspectECO (Economic Cooperation Organization)SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation)
Geographical ScopeTrans-Regional: Encompasses Central Asia, West Asia, and parts of South Asia (10 members across a vast landmass).South Asian: Confined specifically to the 8 nations of the South Asian subcontinent.
Integration LevelLow to Moderate: Hampered by vast geographical distances, infrastructure gaps, and diverse economic structures.Low: Stagnant integration primarily due to persistent political stalemates and security friction.
Shared ChallengesConnectivity & Security: Faces severe transit infrastructure bottlenecks, regional instability, and trade barriers.Political Deadlock & Security: Distrust, border issues, and non-tariff barriers impede collective economic progress.
Pakistan's RoleStrategic Bridge: Serves as a vital transit hub and founding member connecting Central and South Asia.Core Member: Represents a major economy whose strategic relationship with India directly shapes the group's dynamic.
Key DifferenceGeographic & Structural Complexity: Challenges stem from vast distances, varied political-economic models, and landlocked Central Asian geography.Bilateral Paralysis: Challenges stem primarily from the intense, localized India-Pakistan rivalry and institutional vetoes.

 

10.3 SAARC vs. EU (European Union)

 

Comparison Aspect

EU (European Union)

SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation)

Integration Level

Advanced (Economic & Political Union): Features a single market, shared currency (Eurozone), borderless transit (Schengen Area), and supranational governance.

Nascent (Preferential Trade): Limited intra-regional trade with minimal economic harmonization and no supranational structures.

National Sovereignty

Pooled Sovereignty: Member states delegate specific legislative, economic, and judicial powers to shared supranational institutions.

Guarded Sovereignty: Member states strictly maintain national sovereignty, veto mechanisms, and non-interference principles.

Institutional Strength

Autonomous & Supranational: Possesses strong governing bodies (European Commission, Parliament, Court of Justice) with binding regulatory power.

Weak & Intergovernmental: The Secretariat operates with limited executive autonomy, relying entirely on consensus among member states.

Conflict Resolution & Peace

Institutionalized Peace: Designed post-WWII to prevent war through deep interdependency; successfully eliminated conflict among historic rivals.

Persistent Friction: Institutional mechanisms fail to resolve or compartmentalize bilateral disputes, leaving regional initiatives vulnerable to geopolitical crises.

Key Difference

Supranational Commitment: Success relies on political willingness to surrender sovereign control in pursuit of collective economic and political power.

State-Centric Resistance: Progress is hindered by rigid defense of national sovereignty, deep historical mistrust, and persistent bilateral rivalries.

In summary, SAARC stands at the lower end of the integration spectrum compared to ASEAN and especially the EU. Its primary hurdles are the internal bilateral tensions, particularly between India and Pakistan, and the general lack of political will to move beyond rhetoric to concrete, implemented actions. While ECO faces similar infrastructural and political challenges, SAARC's uniqueness lies in the sheer demographic scale and the intense India-Pakistan rivalry.

3.5-Month Extensive Compulsory Subjects Course for CSS Aspirants

Struggling with CSS Compulsory subjects? Crack Pakistan Affairs, Islamiat, GSA & Current Affairs in just 3.5 months with Howfiv’s expert-led course. New batches every April, August & December! Secure your spot now – WhatsApp 0300-6322446!

Join Now

11- Conclusion

Established with the vision of transforming South Asia into a region of peace and collective prosperity, SAARC remains a vital component of Pakistan's foreign policy, offering an essential multilateral platform despite severe operational stagnation. While the organization has built foundational institutional frameworks and agreements like SAFTA, its progress has been routinely derailed by deep-seated bilateral rivalries, most notably between India and Pakistan, compounded by a persistent trust deficit, strict unanimity rules, and weak political will. Geographical proximity and shared socio-economic challenges sustain SAARC's enduring relevance, but its future hinges on structural adaptation. By prioritizing non-contentious sectoral cooperation, such as climate action, health, and energy, through a multi-speed integration framework, the bloc can bypass political deadlocks. Ultimately, realizing SAARC's founding vision requires regional leadership to overcome historical baggage, compartmentalize bilateral disputes, and commit to collective prosperity over persistent geopolitical friction.

CSS Solved Islamiat Past Papers from 2010 to Date by Miss Ayesha Irfan

Gain unmatched conceptual clarity with CSS Solved Islamiat (2010 – To Date) by Miss Ayesha Irfan, the definitive guide to mastering Islamiat for CSS with precision, insight, and unwavering confidence!

Explore Now!

How we have reviewed this article!

At HowTests, every submitted article undergoes a careful editorial review to ensure it aligns with our content standards, relevance, and quality guidelines. Our team evaluates the article for accuracy, originality, clarity, and usefulness to competitive exam aspirants. We strongly emphasise human-written, well-researched content, but we may accept AI-assisted submissions if they provide valuable, verifiable, and educational information.
Sources
Article History
Update History
History
21 September 2026

Written By

Aroosa Nargis Zarkoon

BS Biochemistry

Author

Edited & Proofread by

Miss Iqra Ali

GSA & Pakistan Affairs Coach

Reviewed by

Miss Iqra Ali

GSA & Pakistan Affairs Coach

References 

History
Content Updated On

1st Update: September 21, 2026 | 2nd Update: September 21, 2026

Was this Article helpful?

(300 found it helpful)

Share This Article

Comments